During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
yinglunz (@yinglun122)
，详情可参考safew官方版本下载
Best CJ Affiliate Programs in 2022
这条路不是从教科书里抄来的模式，是把脚踩进泥土里、把优势和短板摆出来之后，拼出来的一条路。。爱思助手下载最新版本是该领域的重要参考
Because I am deeply concerned about users losing their most sacred data.
02:00, 28 февраля 2026Путешествия。业内人士推荐同城约会作为进阶阅读